Bibliographic record
Abstract
Books reviewed in this issue. 18 th and 19 th Century Literature and Culture Cusack, Andrew. The Wanderer in 19 th ‐Century German Literature: Intellectual History and Cultural Criticism. Fauser, Markus, ed. Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. Nickel, Jutta. Revolutionsgedanken: Zur Lektüre der Geschichte in Heinrich Heines Ludwig Börne: Eine Denkschrift. Oschmann, Dirk. Bewegliche Dichtung. Sprachtheorie und Poetik bei Lessing, Schiller und Kleist. 20 th and 21 st Century Literature and Culture Baker, Barrie. Theatre Censorship in Honecker's Germany. Beilein, Matthias. 86 und die Folgen: Robert Schindel, Robert Menasse und Doron Rabinovici im literarischen Feld Österreichs. Braun, Michael, and Georg Guntermann, with Christine Gandner, eds. ‘Gerettet und zugleich von Scham verschlungen’: Neue Annäherungen an die Literatur der ‘Inneren Emigration.’ Fay, Jennifer. Theaters of Occupation. Hollywood and the Reeducation of Postwar Germany. Gerstenberger, Katharina. Writing the New Berlin. The German Capital in Post‐Wall Literature. Kiss, Endre, Paul Michael Lützeler, and Gabriella Rácz, eds. Hermann Brochs literarische Freundschaften. Kittel, Sabine. “Places for the Displaced”: Biographische Bewältigungsmuster von weiblichen jüdischen Konzentrationslager‐Überlebenden in den USA. Schmitz, Helmut, ed. A Nation of Victims? Representations of German Wartime Suffering from 1945 to the Present. Vaget, Hans Rudolf, ed. Thomas Mann's The Magic Mountain: A Casebook. Waine, Anthony. Changing Cultural Tastes: Writers and the Popular in Modern Germany. German Studies across the Disciplines Andriopoulos, Stefan. Possessed: Hypnotic Crimes, Corporate Fiction, and the Invention of Cinema. Brüggemann, Heinz. Walter Benjamin über Spiel, Farbe und Phantasie. Youens, Susan. Heinrich Heine and the Lied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.683 | 0.685 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".