Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notice D. S. Martin (bio) Do we ever stop to notice the rightness of organic designsthe broad-leafed maples that grab every raindrop they canevery ray of light so light that they're almost weightlessextending as far as possible beyond the branches' reachproviding a place for us to escape the heat & for mosses& mushrooms to flourish on the forest floor?Is it coincidence that their fibres are so fittingfor a builder's needs for fuelthat their roots prevent soil from washing away& they breathe out what we need to breathe in? Do we notice the efficiency of man-made thingsthe strength of intersecting lines right angleswithin a window frame dividing four panes of glasstelephone pole after telephone pole stretching acrossthe prairie a ship's mast rising above the seathat practical recurring patternbuilders use when framing a house?Do you think as I do of its significancebeyond that of structural design& notice heaven wink at the coincidence? [End Page 126] D. S. Martin D.S. Martin is a Canadian poet whose work has appeared in Canadian Literature, Christianity & Literature, The Dalhousie Review and Queen's Quarterly. His most recent poetry collection, Poiema (Wipf & Stock, 2008) received an award from The Word Guild in 2009. ds_martin@yahoo.com Copyright © 2011 The Johns Hopkins University Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".