MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Naples, 1300–1700

2020· reference-entry· en· W4239665520 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ronald G. Musto

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2020
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyScholarshipHistoryMonarchyPeriod (music)Early modern EuropeLegendMiddle AgesEarly modern periodAncient historyHumanismState (computer science)ClassicsPortraitArtArchaeologyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The history of Naples and its kingdom (Regno) during these four centuries is one of constant change, foreign influence, and internal turmoil and renewal: in short, a major metropolis of early modern Europe. While these centuries have been intensely studied in Italy and Europe, Anglophone scholarship had been slow to follow the lead. The Angevin period (1265–1442) has attracted few Anglophone scholars, mostly in art history and textual study, and their numbers fluctuate regularly. The Aragonese period (1442–1504) has been more fortunate as this coincides with Renaissance studies for humanism, the classical art impulse, and the new sciences. The Spanish period (1504–1707) shares the fate of both the early modern Mediterranean and Iberian studies, both attached to larger European trends. Early modern Naples, like its master Spain, has been the object both of the Black Legend and of subsequent historiographical disdain among Anglophones for the monarchical and supposedly backward nature of its governance, economy, and Catholic culture. This article therefore includes major works in both English and Italian and divides entries according to these dynastic demarcations. One of the major historiographical issues in Neapolitan studies is the destruction of the state archives by the retreating Nazis in September 1943 in which Angevin, Aragonese, and many earlier archives were firebombed. See Riccardo Filangieri, “Report on the Destruction by the Germans, September 30, 1943, of the Depository of Priceless Historical Records of the Naples State Archives”. Given the pan-Mediterranean interests and influence of Neapolitan dynasties, however, we have been fortunate in the survival of copies of many records in Marseilles (Angevin) and Barcelona (Aragonese). These have been meticulously reconstructed since the mid-20th century by a research team first assembled in Filangieri, et al. 1950. Spanish materials are housed largely in Neapolitan private and church archives and in Barcelona, Simancas, and elsewhere. We are more fortunate in narrative sources, which were systematically studied in Bartolommeo Capasso, Le fonti della storia delle provincie napolitane dal 568 al 1500. Important chronicles, diaries, relazioni, and archival materials survive for all these periods and have been published, many with recent editions. Scholars at Naples have also undertaken a comprehensive philological and contextual study of these works to place them within both Latin and vernacular literatures and literacies. Also of major importance has been the topographical study of the city itself, confined to its tufa platform from its ancient foundations into the Spanish period when exponential growth burst beyond the medieval walls to encompass extensive areas to the city’s west and south. This article concentrates on books and series and lists only select fundamental articles. Several of the volumes listed are collections of essays that offer the latest research findings. Earlier works incorporated into current research have not always been included here but can be accessed through these later studies’ bibliographies and notes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207