Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract MOROCCAN FASHION: DESIGN CULTURE AND TRADITION, M. ANGELA JANSEN (2015) London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 144 pp., ISBN: 9781472524677, h/bk, $89.79 INDIAN FASHION: TRADITION, INNOVATION, STYLE, ARTI SANDHU (2015) 1st ed., London, New Delhi, New York and Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic, 216 pp., ISBN: 9781847887795, p/bk, $29.95 DRESS AND IDEOLOGY, SHOSHANA-ROSE MARZEL AND GUY D. STIEBEL (2015) London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 248 pp., ISBN: HB-9781472525499, p/bk, $27.99 FASHION WRITING AND CRITICISM: HISTORY, THEORY, PRACTICE, PETER MCNEIL AND SANDA MILLER (2014) London and New York: Bloomsbury, 151 pp., ISBN: 9870857854469, £19.99 DIANA AND BEYOND: WHITE FEMININITY, NATIONAL IDENTITY, AND CONTEMPORARY MEDIA CULTURE, RAKA SHOME (2014) Urbana, Chicago and Springfield: University of Illinois Press, 272 pp., ISBN: 9780252038730, cloth, $95; ISBN: 9780252080302, p/bk, $30; ISBN: 9780252096686, e-book COOL SHADES: THE HISTORY AND MEANING OF SUNGLASSES, VANESSA BROWN (2015) London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 177 pp., ISBN: 9780857854445, p/bk, £19.99 AFRICA IN THE AMERICAN IMAGINATION: POPULAR CULTURE, RACIALIZED IDENTITIES, AND AFRICAN VISUAL CULTURE, CAROL MAGEE (2012, 2014) Jackson, Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi, 263 pp., ISBN 978-1-617703-152-6 (h/bk), ISBN 978-1- 61703-153-3 (ebook), $55.00
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.616 | 0.531 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".