MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239682824 · doi:10.1177/2325967113s00058

Pre-operative Femoral Nerve Block in Hip Arthroscopy—A Retrospective Review of 108 Consecutive Cases

2013· article· en· W4239682824 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew P. Dold, M. Lucas Murnaghan, Richard Brull, Daniel B. Whelan

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePacuHip arthroscopyAnesthesiaFemoral nerveOxycodoneSurgeryArthroscopyRetrospective cohort studyNauseaBody mass indexNerve blockOpioid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pre-operative femoral nerve block for post-operative pain control in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 108 consecutive hip arthroscopy cases (in 103 patients) was carried out. All patients underwent hip arthroscopy at a single academic centre by two orthpaedic surgeons with advanced fellowship training in hip arthroscopy. All patients underwent arthroscopy under general anaesthetic with our without pre-operative femoral nerve block. Patients were separated into two groups based on the presence or absence of a pre-operative femoral nerve block prior to induction of general anesthesia. Groups were compared with respect to patient gender, age, body mass index (BMI), ASA Physical Status classification, procedure performed, operative time, total intra-operative morphine-equivalent dose, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores (0 to 10) recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post-operatively, total PACU morphine-equivalent dose, presence of nausea or vomiting in the PACU, time to discharge from PACU, oxycodone consumption in the surgical day care unit (SDCU), and highest pain score (0 to 10) in the SDCU prior to discharge. Results: Twelve cases were excluded from analysis for a total of 96 cases (in 92 patients). Forty patients had general anesthesia alone (Group A) and 56 patients had a pre-operative femoral nerve block prior to the induction of general anesthesia (Group B). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to gender, age, weight, height, BMI, ASA classification, or type of procedure performed. Patients who received a femoral nerve block had a significantly shorter operative time and received a significantly lower total intra-operative morphine-equivalent dose than those patients who did not receive a block. Post-operative pain scores were lower at all time points for the femoral nerve block group, however statistical significance was seen only at the 60 minute post-operative time point (p < 0.05). Patients who did not receive a block had significantly higher morphine-equivalent doses in the PACU. There was no difference in rates of nausea and vomiting and time to discharge from the PACU between the two groups. Oxycodone consumption in the surgical day care unit (SDCU) was similar between groups, but the femoral nerve block patients had significantly lower pain scores prior to discharge from the SDCU. Two patients in Group A group were admitted to hospital post-operatively due to inadequate post-operative pain control. No complications were noted in any patient with regard to the femoral nerve block. Conclusion: A pre-operative femoral nerve block is a safe procedure that may decrease the requirement for intra-operative morphine while providing effective post-operative pain control in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207