MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Trafficking of green fluorescent protein tagged‐vesicular acetylcholine transporter to varicosities in a cholinergic cell line

2001· article· en· W4239690559 on OpenAlexaff
M. S. Santos, Júllya Vitória de Matos Barbosa, G. S. Veloso, Filipe da Cruz Ribeiro, C. Kushmerick, M. V. Gomez, Stephen S. G. Ferguson, Vânia F. Prado, Marco A. M. Prado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVesicular acetylcholine transporterColocalizationGreen fluorescent proteinEndosomeCell biologyFluorescence microscopeBiologyMolecular biologyChemistryBiophysicsCholinergicFluorescenceBiochemistryNeuroscienceIntracellularCholine acetyltransferase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The publishers wish to apologize for the substandard printing of Figs 4 and 5 of the above article that appeared in J. Neurochem.78, pp. 1104–1113. We reproduce Figs 4 and 5 below as they should have appeared. GFP–VAChT is present in early and recycling endosomes. SN56 cells were transfected with GFP–VAChT and examined by confocal microscopy (a and c). (b) Labeling of cells in (a) with Tfn-TxR for 5 min at 37°C. Arrows indicate some of the structures labeled by both GFP–VAChT and Tfn-TxR. Bar, 10 μm. (d) Labeling of cells in (c) with Tfn-TxR for 20 min at 37°C. Arrows indicate colocalization of GFP–VAChT and transferrin in recycling endosomes. The arrowhead shows colocalization in early endosomes. Bar, 20 μm. GFP–VAChT is present in Rab5-positive endosomes. (a) Cells were transfected with GFP–Rab5 construct, and living cells were examined by serial Z-sectioning. The maximum Z projection is presented. (b) Image of the same cell as in (a) stained with FM4-64 for 30 min. Arrows indicate colocalization of GFP–Rab5 and FM4-64. (c) Coexpression of GFP–VAChT and the constitutively activated Rab5 mutant Q79L. Cells were examined by serial Z-sectioning and the maximum Z projection is shown. Expression of Rab5:Q79L results in larger endosomes visualized after incubation with FM4-64 (c2). GFP–VAChT (c1) also appears in structures larger than that observed normally (e.g. Figs 1, 2, 3 and 4), which have FM4-64 (c2). Bars, 20 μm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207