MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239756401 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.064

DOP027 Efficacy and safety of an additional 8 weeks of tofacitinib induction therapy: Results of the OCTAVE open study for tofacitinib 8-week induction non-responders

2018· article· en· W4239756401 on OpenAlexaff
B G Feagan, M Dubinsky, D. Quirk, Chudi Nduaka, Eric S. Maller, N Lawendy, C Kayhan, W Wang, Geoffrey Chan, Chunyan Su

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTofacitinibMedicineOpen labelJanus kinase inhibitorInternal medicineUlcerative colitisPlaceboClinical trialOctave (electronics)Phases of clinical researchGastroenterologySurgeryRheumatoid arthritisDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated for ulcerative colitis (UC). The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib was demonstrated in three Phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trials in patients with moderately to severely active UC.1 Patients who received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) for 8 weeks in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 (NCT01465763; NCT01458951) and did not achieve a clinical response (≥3 points and ≥30% decrease from baseline total Mayo score and a decrease in rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] ≥1 point or an absolute subscore of 0 or 1)—i.e. induction non-responders (IndNR)—could enter OCTAVE Open, an ongoing Phase 3, multicentre, open-label, long-term extension study (NCT01470612). Herein, we present preliminary data from OCTAVE Open for IndNR patients. IndNR patients received tofacitinib 10 mg BID in OCTAVE Open. Patients who did not show response at Month 2 were required to discontinue, per protocol. Clinical response, remission (Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1, and RBS of 0) and mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1) were evaluated at Month 2 and Month 12 in OCTAVE Open. Safety data are also presented. In total, 429 IndNR patients enrolled in OCTAVE Open, of whom 295 received tofacitinib 10 mg BID during induction trials (Table). At Month 2, 60.1%, 25.7% and 16.2% of patients achieved clinical response, mucosal healing and remission, respectively, based on observed data. Corresponding values using non-responder imputation were 52.9%, 23.1% and 14.3%. Month 12 data are shown in Table. The proportion of patients with adverse events (AEs) for IndNR patients censored at Month 2 (52.2%) was similar to those in induction trials (tofacitinib, 55.4%; placebo, 56.4%). Likewise, the proportion of patients with serious AEs for IndNR patients censored at Month 2 (3.7%) was similar to those in induction trials (tofacitinib, 3.8%; placebo, 6.0%), with no new safety signals identified. The majority of patients who failed to achieve clinical response to tofacitinib 10 mg BID in induction studies—and who subsequently received an additional 8 weeks of open-label tofacitinib 10 mg BID—achieved clinical response, with a significant number of patients in remission and/or mucosal healing. No new safety signals were observed in the additional 8 weeks of induction. These data suggest a favourable risk-benefit balance of an additional 8 weeks of tofacitinib induction therapy. 1. Sandborn WJ, et al. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med, 2017;376:1723–36.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207