Investigations of Interfacial Coupling Phenomena and its Impact on Recovery Factor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Interfacial coupling phenomena in multiphase-flow through porous media, and its impact on the recovery factor, have been of interest for sometime, especially in the SAGD process and in fractured reservoirs. In this study, a numerical simulator that takes into account inlet end effects was developed to solve the modified transport equations proposed by Bentsen1,2, Ayub and Bentsen3, and Ayub4 and Ayodele5 to account for interfacial coupling phenomena and hydrodynamic effects. Moreover, the simulator was validated using experimental data. Finally, sensitivity analysis studies were carried out with the simulator to show the effect of interfacial coupling phenomena on the recovery factor. Introduction It is well known that Darcy's equation was developed onthe basis of experiments involving single-phase flow through porous media. To account for multiphase flow, Darcy's equation was modified by Muskat et. al. 6 into a form that has been widely used in petroleum reservoir engineering. However, as pointed out by several researchers1,3,7–13, the modified equation can not give accurate recovery predictions when used to simulate multiphase flow in petroleum reservoirs. This is because, in multiphase flow, the presence of one fluid affects the flow of the other fluids; that is interfacial coupling effects (viscous and capillary coupling effects) influence the flow. The viscous coupling effect, first identified by Yuster14, refers to the coupling that arises due to the viscous drag exerted by one fluid on the other when they flow through the same porous medium, and it is usually associated with the mobility of the fluids5. The capillary coupling effect, recently postulated by Babchin and Yuan15 and by Bentsen16, refers to the coupling that arises due to coupling, through the capillary function2, of pressure across the interfaces of the fluids. Moreover, counter-current experimental data17–19 has been used to show that Muskat's extension of Darcy's equation does not correctly describe the physics of multiphase flow through porous media, because the magnitude of the relative permeabilities for a given phase obtained from counter-current flow is always less than that acquired from a co-current experiment conducted in the same porous medium. To closely capture the physics of flow, Bentsen1,2, Ayub and Bentsen3, Ayub4 and Ayodele5 developed a set of modified transport equations that incorporate interfacial coupling and hydrodynamic effects. In the following sections, a one dimensional form of these modified transport equations is solved numerically by developing an Interfacial Coupling Simulator (ICS), simulation results are compared with immiscible displacement experimental data and some conclusions are drawn as well. Mathematical Formulation To describe the one dimensional immiscible displacement flow by using the fractional flow concept, two governing equations, the fractional flow equation and the frontal advance equation, are needed. Fractional Flow Equation With the assumption that two immiscible and incompressible fluids flow through a homogenous and isotropic water-wet porous medium, Bentsen1,2, Ayub and Bentsen3, Ayub4 and Ayodele5 developed a set of modified transport equations whose one dimensional form is as follows: (Equation 1) (Available in full paper) (Equation 2) (Available in full paper)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".