Les Cahiers Anne Hébert. 14, Sexualité(s) dans l'oeuvre d'Anne Hébert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les cinq articles du dossier de ce quatorzime numro des Cahiers Anne Hbert interrogent la reprsentation de la sexualit et des dsirs fminins dans l'oeuvre narrative de l'auteure, qu'ils mettent en rapport avec les schmes sociaux de domination dans l'ordre patriarcal. On trouvera ci-aprs l'avant-propos des responsables de ce numro, Isabelle Boisclair et Catherine Dussault Frenette. Dans le hors-dossier , on lira deux articles qui font ressortir de riches intertextes : tienne Bergeron se penche sur les allusions varies et multiples au conte La Petite sirne d'Andersen dans le roman Est-ce que je te drange? et Claude La Charit montre comment Anne Hbert s'est inspire de la lgende de Marguerite de Roberval, par le recours des lments issus de textes de la Renaissance dans la construction de sa pice L'le de la Demoiselle. Robert Harvey nous propose par ailleurs une analyse dtaille du fonctionnement du songe dans le recueil de pomes Le tombeau des rois. Et Antoine Sirois, qui vient de quitter le comit de direction du Centre et que nous remercions chaleureusement pour ses vingt annes de prsence attentive et assidue, renouvelle la connaissance du bestiaire dans Kamouraska.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".