MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Augsburg

2020· reference-entry· en· W4240005617 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark Häberlein

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2020
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmperorProtestantismEmpireAncient historyFaithConfession (law)HistoryRoman EmpireHistoriographyAnabaptistsHumanismBrotherTheologyClassicsLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The imperial city of Augsburg figures prominently in the history and historiography of the Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation for several reasons. First, Augsburg was an eminent center of printing, artistic production, and humanist learning which also evolved into a major communication hub in the course of the sixteenth century. Second, the city’s name is associated with several crucial events of the period, such as Martin Luther’s interview with Cardinal Cajetan during the imperial diet of 1518; the Augsburg Confession, a Protestant statement of faith penned by Luther’s collaborator Philipp Melanchthon and presented to Emperor Charles V during the imperial diet of 1530; the Augsburg Interim, an essentially Catholic formulation of religious doctrine with some concessions to Protestants that the emperor imposed on the Holy Roman Empire in 1548; and the Religious Peace of Augsburg, a settlement between the emperor (represented by his brother, King Ferdinand) and the empire’s estates during the imperial diet of 1555. Third, Augsburg exemplifies the complexity of religious reform in some German communities. While cities such as Nuremberg or Zurich became associated with one particular strand of reform—Lutheranism or Zwinglianism—early on, various groups rivaled for ascendancy from the 1520s to the 1550s. Followers of Martin Luther were sidelined by adherents Ulrich Zwingli and the Strasbourg reformer Martin Bucer during the 1530s, and Anabaptists attracted a sizable following until the city government cracked down on them in the late 1520s. Meanwhile, the presence of prominent families such as the Fuggers and their close ties to the emperor ensured the survival of a Catholic minority. After years of hesitation and compromise, the city council adopted Protestantism officially in 1534–1537, prohibiting the Mass and dissolving the monasteries. Yet, after the defeat of the Schmalkaldic League in 1547, Emperor Charles V reintroduced Catholic worship in Augsburg and changed the city constitution, giving Catholic patricians (who were his strongest supporters) a disproportionate share of council seats and high administrative offices. The Religious Peace of Augsburg finally provided safeguards for Catholic minorities in imperial cities, thus paving the way for the institutionalized coexistence of the Lutheran and Catholic faiths in Augsburg. Fourth, historians of culture, gender, the urban poor, and marginal groups began to mine the extraordinarily rich holdings of Augsburg’s city archives in the final decades of the 20th century. They found that the city’s tax and court records contain a wealth of information on the common people, who left few records of their own. Augsburg has thus become the focus of a number of innovative studies that explore the social and cultural dimensions of the urban Reformation. It is due to these works that we know more about craftsmen, women, the poor, and the delinquent in Augsburg than in most other 16th-century German cities and towns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3860.175

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and Reformation→Same topicReformation and Early Modern Christianity→French-language works237,207→