MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240014252 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.162

A162 PHYSICIAN DIAGNOSES AND SELF-DIAGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH CELIAC DISEASE IN THE INTERNET ERA

2018· article· en· W4240014252 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jocelyn A. Silvester, Lisa Rigaux, Lesley A. Graff, C N Bernstein, John R. Walker, D Duerksen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical diagnosisDiseasePopulationCohortGluten freePublic healthInternal medicinePediatricsFamily medicinePathologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune condition defined by intestinal inflammation in response to gluten. Manifestations of CD are variable and diagnostic delays are common. With growing public awareness of CD, many individuals are turning to resources such as the Internet, family and friends for health information. In a population of newly diagnosed CD subjects, identify: 1. Alternate diagnoses prior to CD diagnosis 2. Resources used to self-diagnose CD 3. The role of the Internet in directing the diagnosis of CD Between July 2014 and February 2017, adults with positive TTG and/or EMA antibodies and Marsh III histology were prospectively enrolled in the Manitoba CD Cohort. The initial study visit (within 6 weeks of initiating a gluten-free diet) included an optional online survey with items related to symptoms, use of health information sources and diagnoses given prior to CD. Among 99 subjects who completed the survey, median symptom duration was 3 years (IQR 1–10) prediagnosis and 1 year (IQR 0.25–3) prior to seeking health care evaluation. The most common symptoms at diagnosis were gas (58%), urgency (45%) and difficulty concentrating (35%). Many subjects (35%) were given a diagnosis other than CD for their symptoms, most commonly IBS or a psychological diagnosis (Table 1). The Internet and family doctor were considered the most important sources used to identify a diagnosis. About 80% of subjects who were Internet users (n=93) used the Internet to research their symptoms. The most accessed Internet sites were the Canadian Celiac Association (n=55), Mayo clinic (n=52) and WebMD (n=39). One quarter (n=18) made a self-diagnosis based on their search, with 7 concluding that CD was the most likely diagnosis. As a result of their Internet search, 66% talked to a friend, 54% saw their family doctor, and 43% changed their diet. Doctors visits were used to ask for a TTG (31%), discuss what was found on the Internet (27%) and/or ask for a gastroenterology referral (24%). Many doctors and patients attribute symptoms of CD to alternate conditions, which may contribute to diagnostic delays. Many individuals diagnosed with CD used the Internet to research their symptoms thereby initiating the CD evaluation. More work is needed to raise awareness about CD screening. Diagnoses for CD symptoms None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207