MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240048611 · doi:10.5325/jnietstud.44.2.0139

Editor's Introduction

2013· article· en· W4240048611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica N. Berry

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Nietzsche Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReprintSession (web analytics)Reading (process)ClassicsPhilosophyLibrary scienceArt historyHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The papers published in this issue were presented at North American Nietzsche Society (NANS) sessions held in conjunction with the divisional meetings of the American Philosophical Association from the end of 2007 through 2009. I would like to thank Richard Schacht and the other members of the program committee for their continued service to Nietzsche studies, and I thank Cameron Smith for invaluable editorial assistance in the production of this issue. The first three papers published here were presented on December 29, 2007 at the Eastern Division Meeting in Baltimore, where NANS held an ‘Author Meets Critics’ session devoted to a discussion of Robert B. Pippin's Nietzsche, moraliste français: La conception nietzschéenne d'une psychologie philosophique (Odile Jacob, 2006). Professor Pippin's reading was originally developed for a lecture series at the Collège de France (Paris) in October and November of 2004. At our session in Baltimore, chaired by Nadeem Hussain, Christa Davis Acampora, R. Lanier Anderson, and James Conant delivered critical remarks, with a reply by Robert Pippin. We are pleased to be able to reprint here the remarks by Professors Acampora and Anderson, as well as Professor Pippin's reply. These contributions are based on the revised and expanded version of Nietzsche, moraliste français, published in English as Nietzsche, Psychology, and First Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, 2010).The next two papers, by Anthony K. Jensen and Henrik Rydenfelt, were blind-refereed by the NANS Program Committee and selected from among those submitted for its annual call for papers to be presented at the Central Division Meeting in Chicago (April 19, 2008). The session was chaired by James Conant, who also chaired the Eastern Division in Philadelphia later that year (December 29, 2008), with papers by Stephen Mulhall and Paul Franks (comments from Stanley Cavell are not included here). The following year, at the Central Division Meeting in Chicago (February 21, 2009), Richard Schacht and Maudemarie Clark presented papers for a session on ‘Nietzsche and Lamarckism’ chaired by Lanier Anderson, and at the Pacific Division Meeting in Vancouver (April 10, 2009), Mark Migotti and Paul Katsafanas presented papers on Nietzsche and psychology in a session chaired by Paul S. Loeb (comments from Scott Jenkins not included here). Finally, at the 2009 Eastern Division Meeting in New York (December 29), Patrick Forber, Catherine Wilson, and Dirk Johnson participated in a session on ‘Nietzsche and Darwin: Reflections on the Sesquicentenary of The Origin of Species’, with Christa Acampora as chair.One session in 2008 deserves special mention here, although its presentations are not published in this issue. On March 21, members of the Nietzsche community gathered at a memorial session of the North American Nietzsche Society, “Living with Robert C. Solomon.” Professor Solomon, who passed away on January 2, 2007, was a gifted teacher, a prolific writer and a passionate philosopher whose contributions to Nietzsche studies are inestimable in their scope and impact. In his book, Living with Nietzsche (Oxford, 2003), Professor Solomon recounted how his introduction to Nietzsche's thought had dramatically changed the course of his own life, and he presented Nietzsche to us as a forerunner of existentialism—a philosopher who exhorts us to take responsibility for our lives, embrace and love our fates, and value what makes us human, all too human beings. Almost as much as Nietzsche himself, he resisted reductionism, pedantry, and passivity, and for his students, Professor Solomon brought Nietzsche's ideas to life in his lectures and books. In a session organized and chaired by Lanier Anderson and Professor Solomon's wife, Kathleen M. Higgins, who provided her generous comments and led an appropriately spirited discussion, personal remembrances and tributes were offered by Jessica N. Berry, Daniel Conway, Paul S. Loeb, Shari Starrett, and Tracy B. Strong. This issue of The Journal of Nietzsche Studies is dedicated to the memory of a cherished friend and colleague.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0110.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1660.089

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Nietzsche StudiesSame topicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and HegelFrench-language works237,207