MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4240082975 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noy148.977

RBTT-08. EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A PHASE III TRIAL OF MARIZOMIB IN COMBINATION WITH STANDARD TEMOZOLOMIDE-BASED RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS STANDARD TEMOZOLOMIDE-BASED RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2018· article· en· W4240082975 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Roth, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Thierry Gorlia, F. Dhermain, Maureen Vanlancker, Béatrice Fournier, Sarah Nuyens, Chris J. O’Callaghan, Émilie Le Rhun, Ileana Elias, Martin J. van den Bent, Warren Mason, Benjamin Winograd, Michael Weller

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideMedicineOncologyDacarbazineInternal medicineRadiation therapyPopulationChemotherapyQuality of life (healthcare)Phases of clinical researchRandomized controlled trialClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes maximum safe surgery, involved-field radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant and up to six cycles of maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). However, the prognosis remains poor and there is a high unmet need to provide new drugs to patients with glioblastoma. Marizomib is a novel, brain-penetrant irreversible pan-proteasome inhibitor that has been successfully assessed in phase I studies in patients with newly diagnosed as well as recurrent glioblastoma. EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase III superiority trial. To be eligible, patients need to have histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma. A total of 750 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1. Stratification factors include institution, age, Karnofsky performance status and extent of surgery. The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard treatment (TMZ/RT→TMZ) with patients receiving standard treatment only. The testing strategy is defined to assess this objective in both the intent-to-treat population and the subgroup of patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, neurocognitive function and quality of life. An accompanying translational research program has been set up. The study will be opened at 50 EORTC sites in Europe and done as an intergroup collaboration with the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) with 25 sites in Canada and additional sites in the US. Patient enrolment is planned to start in June 2018 and an update on the enrolment status will be provided at the SNO conference. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345095

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→