MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantifying the hole distribution in cuprates: Atomic‐resolution near‐edge fine‐structures of the superconductor <scp>Sr3Ca11Cu24O41</scp>

2016· other· en· W4240118310 on OpenAlexaff
Matthieu Bugnet, Guillaume Radtke, Stefan Löffler, P. Schattschneider, D. G. Hawthorn, H. A. Dabkowska, G. M. Luke, G. A. Sawatzky, Gianluigi A. Botton

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBrockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperconductivityCuprateValence (chemistry)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsDopingCrystal structureChemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sr 14‐x Ca x Cu 24 O 41 is a fascinating member in the family of cuprates, not only because of its peculiar crystal structure where two distinct units, corner‐shared CuO 2 chains and edge‐shared Cu 2 O 3 ladders, coexist within the unit cell but also because it is the only known superconductor with a non two‐dimensional CuO 2 plane structure. Indeed, the superconducting state theoretically predicted by E. Dagotto and T.M. Rice [1] was first observed experimentally in Sr 0.4 Ca 13.6 Cu 24 O 41.84 below T c = 12 K and for pressures starting from 3 GPa [2]. Independently of the Ca composition, Sr 14‐x Ca x Cu 24 O 41 is an intrinsically hole‐doped compound with 6 holes per formula unit, leading to an average Cu valence of +2.25. A central issue for understanding the mechanisms leading to superconductivity in this compound is therefore to measure accurately the carrier distribution among CuO 2 chains and Cu 2 O 3 ladders. This task has been undertaken shortly after the discovery of superconductivity in this system [3] but is still a matter of intense debate due to the very scattered nature of the results. For instance, depending on the technique, reported hole concentrations in the ladder layers of Sr 3 Ca 11 Cu 24 O 41 vary from ~1 to ~4.5 holes/formula unit [4,5]. All these results have been obtained with techniques that have a relatively poor spatial resolution ranging from several hundred nanometers to a few micrometers. In this work, we exploit the unmatched spatial‐resolution of STEM‐EELS to measure local hole concentration in superconducting Sr 3 Ca 11 Cu 24 O 41 at the atomic scale and provide, for the first time, a real‐space measurement where spatial separation between chains and ladders is achieved [6]. As shown by F.C. Zhang and T.M. Rice [7], in doped cuprates, the hole strongly binds to the four O atoms surrounding the central Cu through Cu 3d ‐O 2p in‐plane sigma hybridization within the CuO 4 plaquettes. As such, the local hole concentration can be monitored very efficiently through the O‐K pre‐edge structures as shown in Figure 1. These experimental results, combined with inelastic scattering calculations, demonstrate unambiguously that holes lie preferentially within the CuO 2 chains of the structure. In summary, this work illustrates how the combination of near‐edge fine‐structure analyses with atomic resolution in the aberration corrected STEM can improve the understanding of the electronic properties of complex oxides, such as Cu‐based superconductors [8].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: ProceedingsSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207