Book Reviews
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction to the History of Communication: Evolutions and Revolutions , Terence P. Moran (2010) New York: Peter Lang, 382 pp., ISBN: 9781453900024, p/bk, $48.95 Valuation and Media Ecology: Ethics, Morals, and Laws , Corey Anton (ed.) (2010) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 256 pp., ISBN: 9781572738690, p/bk, $26.95, ISBN: 9781572738683, cloth, $59.50 Divine Art, Infernal Machine: The Reception of Printing in the West from First Impressions to the Sense of an Ending , Elizabeth Eisenstein (2011) University of Pennsylvania Press, 384 pp., ISBN: 9780812242805, h/bk, $50.65, ISBN: 9780812222166, p/bk, $26.50 Language, Culture, and Identity: The Legacy of Walter J. Ong, S.J. , Sara van den Berg and Thomas M. Walsh (eds) (2011) New York: Hampton Press, 274 pp., ISBN: 9781572739673, p/bk, $27.95 New New Media , Paul Levinson (2013), 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 240 pp., ISBN: 9780134046785, p/bk, $53.00 Amazing Ourselves to Death: Neil Postman’s Brave New World Revisited , Lance Strate (2014) New York: Peter Lang, 170 pp., ISBN: 9781433119309, p/bk, $39.95 Harold Innis’s History of Communications: Paper and Printing – Antiquity to Early Modernity , William J. Buxton, Michael R. Cheney and Paul Heyer (eds) (2015) Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 185 pp., ISBN: 9781442243385, cloth, $70.00
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it