Hypercoordinated oxazoline and ethyl pyridyl organotin compounds: potential routes to stable polystannanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tetraorganotin chelating tin (IV) compounds containing a rigid (10) and a semi-flexible (18) oxazoline ligand were synthesized by a reaction between the lithiated oxazoline and Ph3SnCl in good yields. Conversion into their corresponding dihalide species by reaction with two equivalents of bromine was undertaken to yield the dibromide species, 13 and 20 respectively. X-ray crystallography of these compounds revealed relatively short tin-nitrogen bond distances (10:2.762 13: 2.383, 18: 3.234 Å). These all fall within the Van der Waal radii of a tin-nitrogen bond and all adopt a distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry in the solid state. Compounds 13 and 20 were converted into the corresponding dihydrides by reaction with NaBH4. Polymerization of the corresponding tin dihydrides produced low molecular weight polymers, 10,100 Da for the rigid species (16) and 3,200 Da for the semi-flexible tin species (22). A tetraorganotin compound containing a chelating ethyl pyridyl ligand (23) was synthesized by reacting 2-vinyl pyridine with triphenyltin hydride via a hydrostannylation reaction which was further reacted with two equivalents of bromine to yield the dibromide species (24). The X-ray crystallographic data of 23 and 24 showed relatively short Sn-N bond lengths of 2.888(2) Å and 2.363(5) Å respectively. Compound 24 will be investigated in the future for the stabilization of polystannanes following the synthesis of the dihydride species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".