Retinoic Acid Regulation of Cdx1: an Indirect Mechanism for Retinoids and Vertebral Specification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retinoic acid (RA) is required for diverse developmental programs, including vertebral specification. Both RA receptor disruption and excess RA result in homeotic transformations of the axial skeleton. These effects are believed to occur through altered expression ofHox genes, several of which have been demonstrated to be direct RA targets. Members of the cdx (caudal) homeobox gene family are also implicated in regulating Hoxexpression. Disruption of cdx1 results in vertebral homeotic transformations and alteration of Hox expression boundaries; similar homeosis is also observed in cdx2heterozygotes. In Xenopus, gain or loss of Cdx function affects vertebral morphogenesis through a mechanism that also correlates with altered Hox expression. Taken together with the finding of putative Cdx binding motifs in several Hoxpromoters, these data strongly support a role for Cdx members in direct regulation of expression of at least some Hox genes. Most retinoid-responsive Hox genes have not been demonstrated to be direct RA targets, suggesting that intermediaries are involved. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that one or morecdx members may transduce the effects of RA onHox transcription. Consistent with this, we present evidence that cdx1 is a direct RA target gene, suggesting an additional pathway for retinoid-dependent vertebral specification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".