MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4240285168 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14590

Molecular Determinants of Spinal Hyperexcitability in Rat and Human Models of Pathological Pain

2021· dissertation· en· W4240285168 on OpenAlexaff
Annemarie Dedek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisinhibitionChronic painNeuroscienceLong-term potentiationSpinal cordEx vivoNociceptionMedicineNMDA receptorNeuropathic painSNiPsychologyPharmacologyIn vivoChemistryReceptorInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic pain is a health crisis with few safe and effective treatments.Understanding the mechanisms that drive chronic pain predicate the development of novel therapeutics for the disease.The superficial dorsal horn (SDH) is an integral part of the pain-processing circuit.Nociceptive output from the SDH is mediated by a homeostatic balance of inhibition and excitation, resulting in pain responses in healthy individuals that are proportional to noxious stimuli.In chronic pain, the balance between inhibition and excitation degrades, resulting in spinal hyperexcitability and an increase in pain outputs to the brain.To study the molecular processes that disrupt the balance of inhibition and excitation within SDH circuitry, we paired a male rat ex vivo pain model with in vivo models.We found that the loss of potassium-chloride cotransporter 2-dependent inhibition (disinhibition) and facilitated excitation (marked by potentiation of excitatory N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, NMDARs) are linked.We determined that downregulation of the phosphatase STEP61 is the linker between disinhibition and NMDAR potentiation in male rats.To address the translational divide that exists between basic science rodent research and clinical trials, we developed an ex vivo pathological pain model using human organ donor tissue.Using this model, we found that the STEP61-mediated link between disinhibition and NMDAR potentiation is conserved in the SDH of male humans.Despite that chronic pain affects women more often than men, the molecular underpinnings of chronic pain have been studied almost exclusively in males.Surprisingly, we found that NMDARs are not potentiated in our female rodent pain models, and that protein markers of disinhibition and facilitated excitation remain unchanged.This demonstrates a sex difference in neuronal pain processing in rodents within the SDH.Further, we used human tissue models to discover that this sex difference is conserved between rats and humans.We conclude that loss of STEP61 links iii disinhibition and facilitated excitation in male rats and humans, but this mechanism of spinal hyperexcitability is sexually dimorphic.The lack of coupling of disinhibition to NMDAR potentiation suggests divergent neuronal signalling drives SDH hyperexcitability and chronic pain in females.This thesis highlights the importance of sex-inclusive research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→