MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240291537 · doi:10.1017/s0261444805232639

Reading and writing

2004· article· en· W4240291537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage Teaching · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)PsychologyLiteracyHistorySociologyLibrary sciencePedagogyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

04–517 Armand, Françoise (U. de Montréal, Canada; Email : Francoise.Armand@umontreal.ca ), Lefrançoise, Pascale, Baron, Agnès, Gomez, Maria-Cécilia and Nuckle, Sylvie. Improving reading and writing learning in underprivileged pluri-ethnic settings . British Journal of Educational Psychology (Leicester, UK), 74 (2004), 437–459. 04–518 Cheng, Y-S. (National Taiwan Normal U., Taiwan; Email : t22035@cc.ntnu.edu.tw ). A measure of second language writing anxiety: scale development and preliminary validation . Journal of Second Language Writing (New York, USA), 13 , 4 (2004), 313–335. 04–519 de Jong, Maria T. and Bus, Adriana G. (Leiden U., Netherlands; Email : jongtm@fsw.leidenuniv.nl ). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children's emergent story understanding . Reading Research Quarterly (Newark, USA), 39 , 4 (2004), 378–393. 04–520 Dunsmuir, Sandra (U. College London, UK; Email : s.dunsmuir@ucl.ac.uk ) and Blatchford, Peter. Predictors of writing competence in 4-to 7-year-old children . British Journal of Educational Psychology (Leicester, UK), 74 (2004), 461–483. 04–521 Forey, Gail (Hong Kong Polytechnic U.). Workplace texts: do they mean the same for teachers and business people? English for Specific Purposes (Oxford,UK), 23 , 4 (2004), 447–469. 04–522 Harwood, Nigel and Hadley, Gregg (U. of Essex, UK). Pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing . English for Specific Purposes . (Oxford, UK), 23 , 4 (2004), 355–379. 04–523 Heinz, Peter J. (Pikes Peak Community College, Colorado Springs, USA). Towards enhanced second language reading comprehension assessment: computerized versus manual scoring of written recall protocols . Reading in a Foreign Language (Hawai'i, USA), 16 , 2 (2004), 97–124. 04–524 Huxford, L. (National Primary Strategy, England). Developing an understanding of the pedagogy of writing in the middle years (age 8–11) . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy . (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 234–244. 04–525 Hyland, Ken (Institute of Education, U. of London, UK; Email : k.hyland@ioe.ac.uk ). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing . Journal of Second Language Writing (New York, USA), 13 , 2 (2004), 133–151. 04–526 Joh, Jeongsoon (Konkuk U., Korea; Email : johjs@konkuk.ac.kr ). Interactions among the reader, text and task variables in EFL reading comprehension performance . English Teaching (Anseonggun, Korea), 59 , 3 (2004) 115–143. 04–527 Lee, Icy (Hong Kong Baptist U., China; Email : icylee@hkbu.edu.hk ). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: the case of Hong Kong . Journal of Second Language Writing (New York, USA), 13 , 4 (2004), 285–312. 04–528 Makalela, Leketi (U. of Limpopo and Michigan State U.). Differential error types in second-language students' written and spoken texts: implications for instruction in writing . Written Communication (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA), 22 , 4 (2004), 368–385. 04–529 McNaughton, S., Lai, M., MacDonald, S. and Farry, S. (Auckland U., Australia). Designing more effective teaching of comprehension in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms in New Zealand . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy . (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 184–197. 04–530 Moore, Tim (Monash U., Australia; Email : tim.moore@celts.monash.edu.au ) and Morton, Janne. Dimensions of difference: a comparison of university writing and IELTS writing . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Oxford, UK), 4 , 1 (2005), 43–66. 04–531 Taguchi, Etsuo (Daito Bunka U., Tokyo; Email : taguchi@ic.daito.ac.jp ), Takayasu-Maass, Miyoko and Gorsuch, Greta J. Developing reading fluency in EFL: How assisted repeated reading and extensive reading affect fluency development . Reading in a Foreign Language (Hawai'i, USA), 16 , 2 (2004), 70–96. 04–532 Yoon, Hyunsook and Hirvela, Alan (The Ohio State U., USA; Email : yoon.98@osu.edu ). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 . Journal of Second Language Writing (New York, USA), 13 , 4 (2004), 257–283.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it