MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240420820 · doi:10.1017/9781107416079.011

Estate of Kazemi <i>v</i>. Islamic Republic of Iran and Others

2015· article· en· W4240420820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortureState immunityLawCustomary international lawInternational lawSovereign immunityPolitical scienceJurisdictionStatutory lawDamagesPublic international lawHuman rightsConstitution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

299 State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — General rule that foreign State immune unless exception to immunity applicable — Canada State Immunity Act 1985 (“SIA”), Section 3(1) — Statutory exceptions to immunity — Section 6 of SIA — Whether applicable — Whether SIA complete codification of law of State immunity in Canada — Whether exceptions to immunity other than those contained in Section 6 of SIA — Whether SIA applicable to acts of torture — Whether foreign State having immunity — Whether Section 3(1) of SIA applicable to individual agents of foreign State — Whether nature of actions relevant Relationship of international law and municipal law — State immunity — SIA — Interpretation — Scope — Whether SIA complete and clear codification of law of State immunity in Canada — Customary international law — Prohibition of torture — Jus cogens norm — Effect on SIA — Whether acts of torture falling within scope of State immunity under customary international law — Whether conflict between rules of jus cogens and rules of State immunity — Judgment of International Court of Justice — Whether SIA applying to acts of torture Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Convention against Torture, 1984 — Whether Article 14(1) of Convention imposing obligation on signatories to provide civil remedy for acts of torture including those committed outside their jurisdiction — Bouzari — Whether any subsequent binding developments in international law — Means of effecting change in Canadian law Human rights — Torture — Damages — Civil proceedings against foreign State for acts of torture — Immunity from jurisdiction — Exceptions — Prohibition of torture constituting jus cogens norm — Whether customary international law rule of State immunity no longer extending to torture — Whether SIA applying to acts of torture — Article 14(1) of Convention against Torture, 1984 — Whether imposing obligation on signatories to provide civil remedy for acts of torture including those committed outside their jurisdiction Human rights — Right to a fair hearing — Right to liberty — Whether Section 3(1) of SIA compatible with Section 2(e) of Canadian Bill of Rights — Whether Section 3(1) of SIA compatible with Section 7 of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1630.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207