REVIEWS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TOOTH FOR AN EYE: A CHOROGRAPHY OF VIOLENCE IN ORLEANS PARISH, DEBORAH LUSTER (2011) Santa Fe, NM: Twin Palms Publishers, 64 pp., 29 illustrations ISBN: 1931885966, h/bk, $75 ‘PROJECT CABRINI GREEN’, BY JAN TICHY, 28 MARCH–29 APRIL 2011, CHICAGO, IL, USA THE BEST OF ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS: FILIP GILISSEN’S IT’S ALL DOWNHILL FROM HERE ON, A 2011 SINT-LUKAS BRUSSELS UNIVERSITY COMMISSION, AND OTHER RECENT WORKS ‘MAKING THINGS PUBLIC: ATMOSPHERES OF DEMOCRACY’ 20 March–7 August 2005, Zentrum für Kunst und Medientechnologie (ZKM), Karlsruhe, Germany ALSO A BOOK MAKING THINGS PUBLIC: ATMOSPHERES OF DEMOCRACY, BRUNO LATOUR AND PETER WEIBEL, (2005) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1072 pp., 550 coloured illustrations ISBN 9780262122795 (hardback), currently out of print GARETH LONG, ‘WHO INVENTED THE DESK?’ THE APARTMENT, VANCOUVER, 4 SEPTEMBER 2010 – 1 MARCH 2011; ARTIST’S TEXT; ONGOING PUBLIC WORKSHOPS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS; ONGOING SERIES OF ARTIST’S PUBLICATIONS GOING PUBLIC, BORIS GROYS, (2010) New York: Sternberg Press, 168 pp., ISBN 9781934105306, paperback, £10.95
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.441 | 0.348 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".