MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Archaellum

2020· other· en· W4240563299 on OpenAlexaff
Ken F. Jarrell, Patrick Tripp, Sonja‐Verena Albers

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Life Sciences · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPilusFlagellumArchaeaBiologyCiliumBacteriaCrosstalkCell biologyOperonMotilityGeneticsEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyGeneEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Each of the three domains of life contains its own unique swimming apparatus. The archaellum (formerly called archaeal flagellum) is a unique, ‘tail‐like’ structure used for motility by single‐celled organisms belonging to the domain Archaea. Although archaella are functionally similar to the flagella found on bacteria, they differ significantly in structure and mode of assembly. Archaella are evolutionarily related to type IV pili, and each of the two systems shares several key homologues required for assembly of the respective structures. Recent studies have contributed much to our knowledge concerning the regulation of the operon encoding the archaellum proteins. In addition, the elucidation of the structures of most of the Fla proteins involved in archaella structure and function, coupled with detailed atomic models of the archaellum, including the motor, has provided major insights into how this unique motility organelle is assembled and functions, often in harsh environments inhabited by many archaea. Key Concepts Each of the three domains of life has a unique motility apparatus, which have recently been assigned distinct names (Archaea: archaellum; Bacteria: flagellum and Eukaryotes: cilium). The archaellum is functionally equivalent to flagellum but is evolutionarily related to a type IV pilus, with the archaella and type IV pili systems sharing important homologues. Archaea have the ability to regulate the synthesis of archaella depending on growth conditions, such as available nutrients and temperature. There can be crosstalk in the regulation of archaella with adhesive pili, allowing the cells under certain conditions to make only one type of appendage, either for swimming or adhesion. N‐Glycosylation of the major filament proteins, the archaellins, is widespread and essential under normal conditions for assembly of filaments. The ATPase responsible for assembly of the archaellins into the filament, that is, FlaI, is also responsible for the hydrolysis of ATP that powers the rotation of archaella. In many archaea, the archaellum interacts with a bacterial‐like chemotaxis system that requires novel chemotaxis proteins to act as adaptors to connect the systems. Not all archaellated species have an associated chemotaxis system. Knowledge of the structure and assembly of archaella has greatly increased in the past 5 years with atomic models of several archaella structures as well as structures of most of the individual archaella proteins and their interaction partners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Life SciencesSame topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207