Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postcolonial Images: Studies in North African Film, Roy Armes, (2005) Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 279 pp., ISBN 18008426796 (pbk) Contrechamps tragiques: Contribution antillaise la thorie littraire, Anne Douaire, (2005) Paris: Presses de l'Universit Paris Sorbonne, 371 pp., ISBN 2840503395 (pbk), 24 Postcolonial Theory and Francophone Literary Studies, H. Adlai Murdoch and Anne Donadey (eds), (2005) Gainsville: University Press of Florida, 282 pp., ISBN 0813027764 (hbk), 65 L'aventure flamande de la Revue Belge: Langues, littratures et cultures dans l'entre-deux-guerres, Reine Meylaerts (2004) Brussels: PIE/Peter Lang, 399 pp., ISBN 9052012199 (pbk) Mediations et francophonie interculturelle, Lucille Guilbert (ed.), (2004) Quebec: Les Presses de l'Universit Laval, 224 pp., ISBN 2763780946 (pbk) Quand on refuse on dit non, Ahmadou Kourouma, (2004) Paris: ditions du Seuil, 168 pp., ISBN 202068022X (pbk), 14 Les Funrailles, Rachid Boudjedra, (2003) Paris: ditions Grasset, 287 pp., ISBN 2246632919, 15 Cousine K, Yasmina Khadra, (2004) Paris: Julliard, 106 pp., ISBN 2260015972 (pbk), 14
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.594 | 0.512 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".