Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2014), "List of contributors", Studies in Law, Politics, and Society (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 63), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. vii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-4337(2014)0000063007 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Akhila L. Ananth Department of Criminology, Law and Society, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Jean Carmalt Department of Law, Politics, and Society, Drake University, Des Moines, IA, USA; Department of Political Science, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA Brandon Chase University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada Lucinda Ferguson Oriel College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Ross Kleinstuber University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, Johnstown, PA, USA Sagit Mor Faculty of Law, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel Book Chapters Studies in law, politics, and society Studies in law, politics, and society Studies in law, politics, and society Copyright page List of contributors Editorial board Where injury or damage is feared: Peace bonds as counter-law? “Families in all their subversive variety”: ☆ Re B (2008), L’Hale: [20]. Overrepresentation, the ethnic child protection penalty, and responding to diversity while protecting children The gracious spaces of children’s law: Innocence and culpability in the construction of a children’s court The dialectics of wrongful life and wrongful birth claims in Israel: A disability critique Human rights in context: International law and spatial injustice in New Orleans, Louisiana Mitigation versus individualism: Examining judges’ capital sentencing decisions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.760 | 0.773 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".