MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240688920 · doi:10.14740/jmc2108w

13q Deletion in a Girl Contributing to Antenatal Stroke, Insulin Resistance and Lymphedema Praecox: Expanding the Clinical Spectrum

2015· article· en· W4240688920 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caroline Ponmani, Dinesh Giri, Khalid Hussain, Senthil Senniappan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphedemaPhenotypePediatricsGirlStroke (engine)Internal medicineGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenotypic description of 13q deletion syndrome is dependent on the location and size of the deleted segment. The syndrome is divided into three groups based on the location of the deletion relative to chromosomal band 13q32. Groups 1 (proximal to q32) and 2 (including q32) have shown distinctive phenotypes including mental retardation and growth deficiency, whereas group 3 (q33-34 deletion) is defined by the presence of mental retardation but usually the absence of major malformations. 13q deletion has been associated with factor VII and X deficiencies. We report a 10-year-old girl with cytogenetically detectable 13q33.3-34 deletion (group 3) and antenatally detected factor VII deficiency leading to stroke in utero and consequently hemiplegia at birth. This is the first report of a 13q deletion associated with factor VII deficiency leading to antenatal stroke. Our patient also developed rapidly progressive obesity and lymphedema praecox which have not been previously reported with 13q deletion. J Med Cases. 2015;6(6):264-267 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2108w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207