MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240696826 · doi:10.1386/jcs.5.2.257_5

Exhibition Reviews

2016· article· en· W4240696826 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexandra Alisauskas, Alison Snowball, Emma German, Shauna Jean Doherty

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curatorial Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionArt historyArtThe artsStudioVisual artsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract LEAP BEFORE YOU LOOK: BLACK MOUNTAIN COLLEGE 1933–1957 Curated by Helen Molesworth and Ruth Erickson, organized by the Institute of Contemporary Art/Boston, Boston, 10 October 2015 – 24 January 2016. Travelling to Hammer Museum, University of California, Los Angeles, 21 February – 14 May 2016, and Wexner Center for the Arts, Ohio State University, Columbus, 17 September 2016 – 1 January 2017. HIPPIE MODERNISM: THE STRUGGLE FOR UTOPIA Curated by Andrew Blauvelt, organized by the Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, 24 October 2015 – 28 February 2016. Travelling to Cranbrook Art Museum, Bloomfield Hills, 19 June – 9 October 2016, and University of California, Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive, Berkeley, 8 February – 21 May 2017. JESS DOBKIN, AN ARTIST-RUN NEWSSTAND Chester Subway Station, Toronto, 8 May 2015 – 28 April 2016 ELMGREEN & DRAGSET PRADA MARFA Curated by Ben Mills and Jess Carroll, Richmond-Adelaide Centre, Toronto, Scotiabank CONTACT Photography Festival, 1–31 May 2016 LIVELY OBJECTS: ENCHANTMENT AND DISRUPTION AT THE MUSEUM OF VANCOUVER Curated by Caroline Seck Langill and Lizzie Muller, Museum of Vancouver, 16 August – 12 October 2015

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5930.405

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curatorial StudiesSame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207