Secretion of cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins from animal cells using novel secretion modules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Production of recombinant proteins that are not secreted outside the producing cells usually requires purification steps that can result in significant yield reductions and loss of biological activity. Using insect cells as a model system to devise the means for secreting recombinant proteins that are not normally destined for secretion outside the producing cells, we initially examined the ability of an insect-specific signal peptide sequence to direct secretion of two intracellular proteins (the cytoplasmic enzyme chloramphenicol acetyl transferase [CAT] and the nuclear protein Bombyx mori chorion factor 1 [BmCF1]) expressed in transfected silkmoth cells. Although this signal sequence functioned efficiently as a chimera with normally secreted proteins, it failed to secrete CAT and BmCF1, suggesting that additional signals are required for passage of these polypeptides through the secretion pathway. For this reason, we also generated a secretion module consisting of the secreted protein juvenile hormone esterase (JHE), a spacer region containing a histidine tag and an endopeptidase cleavage site, to which coding sequences of choice can be cloned as C-terminal extensions. In C-terminal fusions with the CAT and BmCF1 open reading frames, the N-terminal JHE moiety was able to provide all the signals necessary for secretion of CAT and BmCF1 into the extracellular environment. The histidine tag present in the spacer region allowed purification of fusion proteins by metal affinity chromatography under nondenaturing conditions, and the enteropeptidase cleavage site was recognized and cleaved by the cognate protease causing the release of the intracellular proteins from the secretion module. We also show that another secreted protein, human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can substitute for JHE in the secretion module and that these secretion modules can function in mammalian cells. Proteins 2000;41:144–153. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".