Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| May 01, 2002 REPLY Matthew J. Kohn; Matthew J. Kohn 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Elizabeth J. Catlos; Elizabeth J. Catlos 2School of Geology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3031, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Frederick J. Ryerson; Frederick J. Ryerson 3Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar T. Mark Harrison T. Mark Harrison 4Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Matthew J. Kohn 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA Elizabeth J. Catlos 2School of Geology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3031, USA Frederick J. Ryerson 3Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA T. Mark Harrison 4Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 Geological Society of America Geology (2002) 30 (5): 480–481. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0480:R>2.0.CO;2 Article history First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Matthew J. Kohn, Elizabeth J. Catlos, Frederick J. Ryerson, T. Mark Harrison; REPLY. Geology 2002;; 30 (5): 480–481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0480:R>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search We appreciate the comment of Searle et al. and the opportunity to develop and clarify our ideas regarding Main Central thrust evolution. Searle et al. argue that (1) the Main Central thrust should be defined on the basis of "high strain" rather than petrologic, tectonostratigraphic, and geochronologic criteria, and (2) Main Central thrust monazite grains both in the matrix and included in garnet only record late-stage fluid-assisted recrystallization, so that 40Ar/39Ar muscovite ages are preferable chronometers of cooling histories. We are completely puzzled by Searle et al.'s desire to engage in debate over assigning "true Main Central... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.027 | 0.023 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".