Valorisation, stratégies et communication des territoires à l’épreuve de l’authenticité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les travaux présentés dans ce dossier sont un fragment d’une succession de recherches et d’événements scientifiquesconsacrée aux liens entre communication publique et développement territorial lorsqu’ils se couplent à la valorisation des patrimoines naturel, matériel et immatériel. Cette communication, exercée ou appliquée sur des territoires, est abordée selon les perspectives d’organisations institutionnelles et de services publics (ou ayant mission de service public), mais aussi d’associations et d’organisations non gouvernementales (ONG). Puis, à partir des thèmes de mutations économiques et de transformations sociales, comme les jeux et les stratégies d’acteurs qui les conçoivent et les réalisent, les contributions s’interrogent sur la notion d’authenticité ; les enjeux d’une forme d’attractivité et de valorisation des territoires, au Maghreb comme en France, par la communication à l’aune de l’authenticité. Ces travaux s’inscrivent aussi dans un programme de développement (recherche et formation) de la communication publique et territoriale (CPT) – en coopération avec le réseau Cap’Com – dans les pays du Maghreb, en reprenant les quatre piliers de ce champ aux contours spécifiques des sciences de l’information et de la communication (SIC). The papers presented in this issue are a fragment of a succession of research and scientific events examining the links between public communication and territorial development when combined to the valorisation of natural, material and immaterial heritage. This communication, exerted or applied on territories, is discussed from the perspectives of institutional organizations and public services (or having a public service mission), associations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). From the themes of economic changes and social transformations, such as the strategies of actors who design and produce these transformations, the contributions examine the notion of authenticity; the issues of a form of attractiveness and valorisation of territories, in Maghreb as well as in France, through communication in terms of authenticity. These researches are also part of a development program of public and territorial communication (Research and Training) - in collaboration with the Cap'Com network - in the Maghreb countries, covered from the field of information and communication sciences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".