Cloning, Overexpression, and Purification of Aminoglycoside Antibiotic 3-Acetyltransferase-IIIb: Conformational Studies with Bound Substrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aminoglycoside 3-acetyltransferase-IIIb (AAC3), which acetylates N 3 amine of aminoglycoside antibiotics, was cloned from P. Aeruginosa and purified from overexpressing E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. Bound conformations of kanamycin A and ribostamycin, in the active site of the enzyme that modifies the essential N 3B of aminoglycoside antibiotics, were determined by NMR spectroscopy. Experimentally determined interproton distances were used in a simulated annealing protocol to determine enzyme-bound conformations of both antibiotics. Two conformations, consistent with the NOE restraints, were determined for ribostamycin. The only difference between the two conformers was the orientation of the A ring with respect to the rest of the molecule. The average glycosidic dihedral angles were Φ 1A = −22° ± 3 and Ψ 1A = −42° ± 1 (conformer 1) and Φ 1A = −67 °± 0.7 and Φ 1A = −59° ± 0.8 (conformer 2). Three conformers were determined for the enzyme-bound kanamycin A. Two conformers of kanamycin A were matched well with the two conformers of ribostamycin when the A and the B rings of the antibiotics were superimposed. Conformations of kanamycin A and ribostamycin were compared to those of other aminoglycosides that are bound to different enzymes and RNA. The results lend further support to our earlier hypothesis that the A and B rings of aminoglycosides adopt a conformation that is recognized not only by the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes but also by RNA (Serpersu, E. H., Cox, J. R., Digiammarino, E. L., Mohler, M. L., Akal, A., Ekman, D. R., and Owston, M. (2000) Cell Biochem. Biophys . 33, 309−321). These results may be useful in designing new antibiotics to combat the antibiotic resistance against infectious diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".