MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241040395 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2014.7417825

A Signal Space Diversity-Based Time Division Broadcast Protocol in Two-Way Relay Systems

2014· article· en· W4241040395 on OpenAlexaff
Hamza Ümit Sökün, Mehmet C. Ilter, Salama Ikki, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceSpectral efficiencyConstellationAntenna diversityExpression (computer science)Transmission (telecommunications)Topology (electrical circuits)Constellation diagramDiversity gainSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)AlgorithmDecoding methodsBit error rateTelecommunicationsMathematicsWirelessFadingPhysicsBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers a two-way relay system with time division broadcast (TDBC) protocol. In such protocol two end-sources exchange information with each other through help of a half-duplex decode- and-forward relay. To enhance the spectral efficiency in this system, we propose a novel scheme which incorporates signal space diversity with TDBC protocol. In the proposed scheme, original data symbols are rotated by a certain angle before being transmitted, and then the end- sources and the relay cooperate for transmitting in-phase and quadrature components of two consecutive rotated symbols. Thereby, the number of transmitted symbols are doubled over three time slots, which results in an increase in spectral efficiency. In particular, for this system we first derive a closed-form expression for the end- to-end (E2E) error probability with an arbitrary constellation to acquire all the resulting non- uniform constellation cases. Then, using the derived expression, we optimize the rotation angle at the different values of the signal-to-noise ratio to further improve the E2E error probability performance. Numerical results corroborate the theoretical analysis and show that the scheme proposed herein provides not only higher spectral efficiency, but also higher reliability transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207