MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241051173 · doi:10.1093/ibd/zaa010.023

P066 GB004, A NOVEL GUT-TARGETED PROLYL HYDROXYLASE INHIBITOR FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: FIRST-IN-HUMAN, MUTLIPLE-DOSE STUDY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS WITH GUT BIOPSIES

2020· article· en· W4241051173 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barrett G. Levesque, Kristen Taylor Meadows, Akshay Buch, Michael Flynn, Kevin S. Peters, Allan Olson, Jinshan Shen, Masha Sergeeva, Debbie Slee, Courtney Van Biene, Richard Aranda, Greg Opiteck

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityPharmacokineticsPlaceboInflammatory bowel diseaseAdverse effectGastroenterologyUlcerative colitisHypoxia (environmental)Internal medicinePharmacologyDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background GB004 is a small molecule prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (PHDi) that stabilizes hypoxia inducible factors (HIF1-α), key transcription factors involved in the protective cellular responses at the intersection of hypoxia and inflammation. GB004 was selected based on its gut-targeted profile to limit systemic on-target effects associated with HIF1-α stabilization. Consistent with this, orally administered GB004 in a healthy non-human primate model engaged HIF-related genes in the gut, and, in animal models of colitis, demonstrated a significant reduction in disease activity, improvements in histologic measures, and greater exposure in GI tissue relative to plasma. GB004 is in clinical development for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and was shown to be safe in a single ascending dose study. The study described here evaluates the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple daily doses of GB004 in plasma and colon biopsies. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple dose, Phase 1a study conducted in healthy subjects at a single site in Canada. Three dose levels of GB004 formulated as a solution or placebo solution were administered orally once a day for 8 days; safety and PK were evaluated. Plasma levels of HIF target genes EPO and VEGF were determined by immunoassays from samples collected at pre-dose, 4, 8, and 12 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 7. Colon biopsies were obtained one day prior to first dose and at Day 8. Results 42 subjects (20 male and 22 female) were dosed. No serious adverse events or deaths were recorded. The most commonly observed adverse event in GB004-treated subjects was dizziness (31%;10/22); all events were mild and did not result in study drug discontinuation. There were no identified risks of GB004. Following oral dosing, GB004 was rapidly absorbed and eliminated from the systemic circulation, with a median time to maximum concentration of 0.5 hour for all doses. Both Cmax and AUC of GB004 increased in a dose-dependent manner on Day 1 and 7. Concentrations of GB004 measured in colon biopsies were greater than concentrations in the plasma at the time of biopsy. Changes in plasma EPO or VEGF levels were similar for GB004 and placebo with no dose-related effects observed. Conclusions This study demonstrated that multiple daily doses of GB004 solution were safe and tolerable. The PK profile was consistent with its intended preferential exposure in the gut. In support of the gut-targeted exposure, HIF target genes EPO and VEGF were not modulated in plasma. A clinical study of GB004 is ongoing in patients with ulcerative colitis to explore safety, PK, and pharmacodynamics both systemically and within colonic tissue (NCT03860896). A tablet formulation is also being developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207