Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Crypt.an.ae'ro.bac.ter. Gr. adj. kryptos hidden; Gr. pref. an not; Gr. n. aer air; anaero not (living) in air; N.L. masc. n. bacter rod; N.L. masc. n. Cryptanaerobacter referring to the fact that this anaerobic rod was hidden within a culture of another organism taken for pure. Short, rod‐shaped cells, 1 µm × 2 µm. Gram‐stain‐positive . Not flagellated. Strictly anaerobic . Sulfate, thiosulfate, nitrate, nitrite, FeCl 3 , fumarate, and arsenate are not used as electron acceptors. Sulfite is not normally used even though growth stimulation has been noted in certain culture conditions. Not fermentative. Phenol or 4‐hydroxybenzoate ( 4‐OHB ) is required for growth . 4‐OHB is believed to be an electron acceptor for anaerobic respiration. Isolated from a methanogenic consortium derived from a mixture of swamp water, sewage sludge, swine waste, and soil. DNA G + C content ( mol %): 51. Type species : Cryptanaerobacter phenolicus Juteau, Côté, Duckett, Beaudet, Lépine, Villemur and Bisaillon 2005, 249 VP . Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the genus Cryptanaerobacter is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Bacillati / Bacillota / Clostridia / Eubacteriales / Peptococcaceae / Cryptanaerobacter Cryptanaerobacter could not be recovered in GTDB ** . * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".