MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2021· article· en· W4241165899 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Session (web analytics)Government (linguistics)Variety (cybernetics)PleasureChinaLibrary sciencePublic relationsPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsMedical educationEngineeringPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineWorld Wide WebLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It was our great pleasure to welcome all presenters/authors to the 5th Asian Conference on Environmental, Industrial and Energy Engineering (EI2E 2021). EI2E 2021 was organized by the Asia Pacific Institute of Science and Engineering (APISE). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the local government issues many limitations on domestic and international travelling. Thus most of the authors chose the online presentation mode. In consideration of the authors’ safety, to enable more authors to participate, and to reach a wider audience for the conference, EI2E 2021 was finally held as a hybrid conference via Tecent Meeting Software during May 20 to 22, 2021. EI2E 2021 is the international conferences for presenting novel research progress in the fields of Energy and Environmental research. It also serves to foster communication among researchers and practitioners working in a wide variety of areas with a common interest in improving environment protection. The conference enabled many researchers, engineers, and practioners from all over the world to present their most recent achievements. The participants are from Thailand, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Morocco, Peru, China, etc. The conference featured 3 Keynote Speakers (40 minutes each, including Q&A). In addition, the program included 2 oral sessions and 1 poster session. The papers in the oral sessions were allotted 12 minutes each for presentation. Following the end of each session, the audience engaged in technical dialogues and discussed possible ways for future collaboration. A group photo was taken at the conference. List of Committees are available in this pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5350.375

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicSocial Acceptance of Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207