Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal of Paediatrics and Child HealthVolume 49, Issue 11 p. 983-984 Heads UpFree Access Adolescent depression and school environment First published: 20 November 2013 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12423_2AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Adolescents often blame their schools for making them depressed. There is reasonable evidence that adolescents who view their school positively are less likely to become depressed, but less evidence that school can make one depressed. Over 5000 Canadian adolescents participating in a longitudinal study on school success in disadvantaged communities were followed annually from grades 7 to 11 (approximately age 12–16 years).1 The socio-educational environment was assessed using a questionnaire completed by >70 000 adolescents that purported to measure social climate (student–student and teacher–student relationships), learning opportunities (classroom and extracurricular), fairness and rules (clarity and fairness of implementation of rules), and safety (climate of security and school violence). After adjusting for previous depressive symptoms and individual and school confounders, the study found a modest but statistically significant correlation in self-reported depressive symptoms between schools, with an intraclass correlation of 3.3%. A better school environment in grade 8 reduced the risk of depressive symptoms 2–3 years later, an association that was slightly stronger for boys than girls. Reference 1 Briere FN. Pediatrics published online February 11, 2013; doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2172. CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Reviewer: David Isaacs, Children's Hospital at Westmead, david.isaacs@health.nsw.gov.au Volume49, Issue11November 2013Pages 983-984 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".