MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241338078 · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.8266

Neuronline

2011· article· en· W4241338078 on OpenAlex
Nadine Wiper‐Bergeron, Jonathan Weber, Sophie Imbeault, Shannon Goodwin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedEdPORTAL · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroanatomyComputer scienceIdentification (biology)PsychologyArtificial intelligenceCognitive scienceNeuroscienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A good understanding of the 3D organization of deep brain structures is essential to understand brain function, to predict functional deficits following lesion or trauma, and to interpret radiological images. To improve learning of deep cerebral structures for novice neuroanatomists, a stereoscopic, rotatable view of a human brain was used to create a virtual brain that can be rotated in an easy-to-use web-based module: Neuronline. Learners can also slice the virtual brain in both the coronal and horizontal planes, allowing for the identification of deep brain structures. Each brain slice is matched to a corresponding MRI image and labels can be toggled on or off. An orientation diagram helps students locate a structure within the virtual brain. This tool is designed for learners with limited neuroanatomy experience. For the student new to neuroanatomy, learning the organization of deep brain structures and fiber tracts can be daunting. Neuronline also has the advantage of being portable, and can be used prior to gross anatomy lab sessions or in-lab as a study guide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it