MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241352814 · doi:10.1109/aspdac.2003.1195023

Adaptive wire adjustment for bounded skew clock distribution network

2003· article· en· W4241352814 on OpenAlexaff
H. Saaied, D. Al-Khalili, A.J. Al-Khalili, M. Nekili

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ASP-DAC Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2003. · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkewVery-large-scale integrationTiming failureClock skewComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionNode (physics)Clock networkBounded functionDigital clock managerAlgorithmParallel computingMathematicsClock signalEngineeringEmbedded systemJitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we suggest an adaptive approach for the clock distribution network (CDN) to cope with a modification in the VLSI system design. The CDN's wires are adjusted iteratively to reduce the skew that is resulting from a minor modification in the clock pins of a complex VLSI system. Such skew can be remedied by selecting a balancing node (BN) and adjust its edges so that the skew gets smaller. The required edge adjustments are determined using the Elmore delay model. The performance of the algorithm is investigated using different random sets of clock pins. Also, the algorithm is tested by altering some clock pins in a zero skew CDN. For small modifications in a large number of nodes in the CDN, our algorithm can achieve zero skew with less iterations than linear order algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ASP-DAC Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2003.Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207