MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4241389903 · doi:10.33915/etd.2217

Size, age composition, and upstream migration of American eels at the Millville Dam eel ladder, Shenandoah River, West Virginia

2005· dissertation· en· W4241389903 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather Hildebrand

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnguilla rostrataHabitatGeographyEnvironmental scienceFisherySpring (device)OceanographyEscapementHydrology (agriculture)Fish migrationEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abundances of American eel (Anguilla rostrata) are declining along the east coast of the United States and Canada, possibly due to habitat loss and barriers to migration. In Atlantic coast watersheds, dams detain upstream migration of juveniles, and little is known about age class composition, age-length relationships, or environmental cues to upstream migration of yellow-phase eels. An eel ladder was installed on the Millville hydroelectric dam, lower Shenandoah River, WV, to facilitate and monitor the upstream movement of yellow phase eels. Daily length measurements (TL cm) and weights (g) were taken on eels using the ladder during three sampling periods; spring/summer 2004 (May 14-July 23), fall 2004 (Sept 10-30), and spring/summer 2005 (June 1-July 31). Additionally, otolith-based ages were estimated from a subsample of eels. To examine environmental variables associated with upstream migration, candidate models were fit to daily count data and included combinations of four environmental covariates (barometric pressure, local precipitation, lunar illumination, and river flow) and a year effect. A total of 4,847 eels used the ladder during the three sampling periods. Eel sizes were similar among sampling periods (range 19-75 cm TL), and age estimates from 74 eels (21.4-55 cm TL) ranged from 3 to 10 years. Estimates of mean length at age of eels from Shenandoah River were low relative to published estimates from southern and northern latitudes. Peaks in eel counts coincided primarily with low levels of lunar illumination or with rise in river flow, and the data supported an additive model of lunar illumination and river flow. The data did not support single-variable or additive models with covariates of barometric pressure or local precipitation, or models with a year effect. Management strategies for American eels will benefit from short and long-term studies of eel ladders, including additional focus on eel counts, size and age composition, and upstream migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→