MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The presenilins.

2002· review· en· W4241421879 on OpenAlexafffund
Anurag Tandon, Paul E. Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlzheimer Society
KeywordsPresenilinNicastrinTransmembrane proteinBiologyAmyloid precursor proteinAmyloid precursor protein secretaseCell biologyGeneticsAlzheimer's diseaseDiseaseMedicineInternal medicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presenilins are evolutionarily conserved transmembrane proteins that regulate cleavage of certain other proteins in their transmembrane domains. The clinical significance of this regulation is shown by the contribution of presenilin mutations to 20-50% of early-onset cases of inherited Alzheimer's disease. Although the precise molecular mechanism underlying presenilin function or dysfunction remains elusive, presenilins are thought to be part of a complex of proteins that has 'gamma-secretase cleavage' activity, which is clearly central in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Mutations in presenilins increase the production of the longer isoforms of amyloid beta peptide, which are neurotoxic and prone to self-aggregation. Biochemical studies indicate that the presenilins do not act alone but operate within large heteromeric protein complexes, whose components and enzymatic core are the subject of much study and controversy; one essential component is nicastrin. The presenilin primary sequence is remarkably well conserved in eukaryotes, suggesting some functional conservation; indeed, defects caused by mutations in the nemotode presenilin homolog can be rescued by human presenilin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGenome BiologySame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207