Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In many industrialized countries, endometrial cancer has surpassed cervical cancer as the most common form of malignancy affecting the female genital tract. This has occurred due to the effectiveness of screening programs in reducing both the incidence and mortality rates for cervical cancer. Improvement in life expectancy for many women also has led to an increased number of patients being diagnosed with endometrial cancer, which is predominantly a disease of postmenopausal women. Endometrial cancer most often presents with the symptom of postmenopausal bleeding. Because this manifestation is often found early in the course of the disease and is significantly alarming, women generally present themselves promptly to their physicians for investigation. The majority of endometrial cancers are thus diagnosed as stage I lesions. In certain situations, however, this condition has the potential to behave in an aggressive fashion, resulting in recurrence and ultimately death. The identification of those factors that place patients at high risk for recurrence has been the primary focus of much of the research on this condition in the past 20 years. Although endometrial cancer is predominantly a disease of postmenopausal women, approximately 20–25% of cases will occur before menopause and a further 5% occur before age 40. Obesity, particularly upper body obesity, nulliparity, and late menopause have all been associated with an increase in risk for endometrial cancer. Use of exogenous unopposed estrogen and tamoxifen have also been associated with an increased risk for the development of endometrial cancer. Use of oral contraceptive tablets and smoking, however, have been associated with a decrease in the risk for endometrial cancer and women who develop endometrial cancer while on exogenous estrogen appear to have favorable prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".