ANALISIS PERHITUNGAN BIAYA PRODUKSI TERHADAP PENDAPATAN PADA PENGUSAHA PRODUK LANTING BUMBU KARNING PANCA RASA JATILUHUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cost Production is costs incurred to process raw materials into finished products ready tosold. The elements of cost production consist of raw material costs, direct labor, and overhead costs. This study aims to determine and analyze the Calculation of Cost Production to Revenue at Product LantingBumbuKarning/ Panca Rasa in Jatiluhur Village.
 This study used quantitative methods, the preparation using descriptive analysis is a method that aims to get a picture and description of certain symptoms and explain the relationship between variables based on facts by way of collecting and analyzing data in the form of numbers.
 Calculation of production cost using full costing method that is by summing all element of raw material cost, direct labor and factory overhead cost. While setting the selling price using the concept of total cost.
 From the analysis result, it is known that the sales of 2016 quarter I amounted to Rp 31,900,000, the second quarter amounted to Rp 84,100,000 or increased 163.64%, the third quarter decreased by 58.62% or became Rp 34.8 million, and the fourth quarter again increased by Rp 92.800.000 or 166.67%. Meanwhile, the production cost for the first quarter amounted to Rp 24,047,500, the second quarter amounted to Rp 56,167,300 (increased 133.57%), the third quarter was Rp 25,887,600 (decreased 53.91%), and the fourth quarter was Rp 61,606,600 ( 135.87% increase). For operational costs in the first quarter I-IV stable that is Rp 3.600.000. From the unstable total production cost, the net income for the first quarter amounted to Rp 4,252,500, the second quarter amounted to Rp 24,332,700 (472.20% increase), the third quarter was Rp 5,312,400 (decreased 78.17%), and the fourth quarter amounted to Rp 27,593,400 (an increase of 419.41%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".