MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241768493 · doi:10.25035/ijare.09.01.03

Toward Defining Water Competency: An American Red Cross Definition

2015· article· en· W4241768493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aquatic Research and Education · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Red Cross SocietyHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHistoryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water competency entails more than a perception of just being able to swim and an operational definition of water competency is necessary for learn-to-swim program evaluation and policy development. To devise an operational definition, members of the American Red Cross Scientific Advisory Aquatic subcouncil surveyed nine key national (United States) organizations, 14 international organizations, and 19 other key informants involved with water safety and swimming activities for their requirements for swimming in the "deep end." The most frequently reported variables included (a) distance swum, (b) floating or treading water, (c) entrance into water unassisted, and (d) exit from the water unassisted. The subcouncil proposed that water competency include the following: (1) entry with total submersion;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it