MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241866799 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24367-8_2

Big Data

2019· book-chapter· en· W4241866799 on OpenAlexaff
John C. Dill

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced information and knowledge processing · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBig Data Technologies and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataData scienceBusiness intelligenceComputer scienceAnalyticsBusiness analyticsData analysisVariety (cybernetics)Cultural analyticsUnstructured dataSoftware analyticsPredictive analyticsCloud computingData visualizationVisualizationKnowledge managementData miningWorld Wide WebSemantic analyticsArtificial intelligenceBusiness analysisThe InternetBusiness modelManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major business trend for most organizations is big data and business analytics, along with mobile, cloud, and social media technologies. Big data may be characterized by its volume, velocity, and variety. Most data are heterogenous and unstructured as it contains mixed and often indeterminate amounts of different kinds of information such as text, images, dates, numbers, and other information in various formats. Data analysts and scientists spend most of their time in preparing, cleaning, and wrangling their data. Data analytics may be divided into descriptive analytics, predictive analytics, and prescriptive analytics. The continuing growth of data means that large-scale analytics becomes critical for business competitiveness, and also facilitating internal decision-making processes based on data internal to the organization. Big data requires complex and advanced visualization techniques in order to fully understand the information contained in the data. Machine learning and deep learning methods are being integrated into data analytics processes. Machine learning uses statistical techniques to give computer systems the ability to “learn” (i.e., progressively improve performance on a specific task) with data. Current issues and challenges with big data and its analysis are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.086

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.281
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced information and knowledge processingSame topicBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207