Bibliographic record
Abstract
The direct discharge of tannery waste and effluent could result in severe chromium (Cr) contamination in soils. This study focused on the remediation of Cr-contaminated soil via co-pyrolysis with rice straw. The influence of co-pyrolysis temperature, rice straw / soil mixing ratio and reaction time on Cr immobilization were investigated. Compared to untreated soil, the leachable Cr and total Cr(VI) in co-pyrolyzed soil were decreased by up to 95 % and 86 %, respectively. With increasing temperature and rice straw addition, the leachable Cr and total Cr(VI) were reduced. Reaction time did not show a significant effect on Cr immobilization. The time-varying desorption test indicated that the equilibrium amount of released Cr in various extractants was inhibited by co-pyrolysis. The Simple Bioaccessibility Extraction Test also showed that the bioaccessible Cr in the gastric phase was decreased after co-pyrolysis. The results suggested that co-pyrolysis was beneficial on Cr immobilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".