MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241888357 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001095

Short-course antibiotics for acute otitis media

2000· review· en· W4241888357 on OpenAlexaff
Anita L. Kozyrskyj, Terry P. Klassen, Michael Moffatt, Krystal Harvey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaWinnipeg Regional Health AuthorityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntibioticsOdds ratioOtitisInternal medicineConfidence intervalEar infectionRandomized controlled trialPediatricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Otitis media is a common pediatric problem, for which antibiotics are frequently prescribed. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a short course of antibiotics (less than seven days) in comparison to a longer course (seven days or greater) for the treatment of acute otitis media in children. SEARCH STRATEGY: The medical literature was searched for randomized controlled studies of the treatment of ear infections in children with antibiotics published from January 1966 to July 1997. Search last updated March 1998. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they met the following criteria: subjects one month to 18 years of age, clinical diagnosis of ear infection, no previous antimicrobial therapy and randomization to treatment with less than seven days versus seven days or more of antibiotics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on treatment outcomes were extracted from individual studies, and combined in the form of a summary odds ratio. A summary odds ratio (OR) equivalent to one indicated that the treatment failure rate following less than seven days of antibiotic treatment was similar to the failure rate following seven days or more of antibiotic. MAIN RESULTS: The summary OR for treatment outcomes at eight to 19 days in 1,524 children treated with short-acting antibiotics for five days versus eight to 10 days was 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.98, but by 20 to 30 days outcomes between treatment groups (n=2,115) were comparable (OR=1.22, 95% CI:0.98-1.54). The absolute difference in treatment failure (Random effects model RD=2.9%, 95%CI:-0.3% to 6.1%) at 20 to 30 days suggests that at minimum 17 children would need to be treated with the long course of short-acting antibiotics to avoid one treatment failure. Similarity in outcomes was observed for up to three months following therapy (OR=1.16,95% CI=0.9-1.5). Comparable outcomes were shown between treatment with ceftriaxone or azithromycin, and more than seven days of other antibiotics. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that five days of short-acting antibiotic is effective treatment for uncomplicated ear infections in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0240.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsFrench-language works237,207