Forenzik as a means of ensuringfinancial stability of the state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article substantiates the need for the development of the financial services market in the field of foresight, the relationship between the foresight and the financial stability of the flow of economic processes in society is noted. It is pointed out that in the conditions of the crisis, the number of economic crimes committed is increasing and the importance of the use of preventive measures is emphasized. Based on the generalization of the approaches of many researchers to the definition of the concept of "preventive", the authors formulate their original definition. The experience of providing the big four audit and consulting companies with the services of a forecaster is briefly described. Particular attention is paid to the results of the Global Review of Economic Crimes for 2018 and 2019 relative to large companies and continents, the Review of the state of Crime in the member States of the Commonwealth of Independent States in the first quarter of 2020, as well as the Report of Positive Technologies on cyber threats in 2020, which are analyzed and systematized by the authors in the context of the subject of this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".