MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241984763 · doi:10.21203/rs.2.21217/v1

Primary outcome reporting in adolescent depression clinical trials needs standardization

2020· preprint· en· W4241984763 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Monsour, Emma J. Mew, Sagar Patel, Alyssandra Chee-A-Tow, Leena Saeed, L. Santos, Darren Courtney, Priya Watson, Suneeta Monga, Péter Szatmári, Martin Offringa, Nancy J. Butcher

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStandardizationOutcome (game theory)Depression (economics)Clinical trialMedicinePsychologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyPolitical scienceInternal medicineEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.863
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.927
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.8630.927
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.016
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0230.012
Open science0.0070.009
Research integrity0.0070.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.785
GPT teacher head0.700
Teacher spread0.085 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207