Conference Panels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract PANEL SESSION 1 – IRAQI STUDIES AS A FIELD OF STUDY (10:00 A.M.–11:30 A.M.) PANEL SESSION 2 – ROUNDTABLE ON IRAQ’S PROGRESSIVE FORCES (11:45 A.M.–01:15 P.M.) PANEL SESSION 3 – IRAQ’S DOMESTIC ECONOMY (02:30 P.M.–04:30 P.M.) PANEL SESSION 4 – IRAQ AND THE REGIONAL STATE SYSTEM (04:45 P.M.–06:30 P.M.) PANEL SESSION 5 – THE ASSAULT ON IRAQIS AND IRAQI CULTURE (09:00 A.M.–10:30 A.M.) PANEL SESSION 6 – MONARCHICAL IRAQ: EDUCATION, LITERATURE, MEMORY (10:45 A.M.–12:15 P.M.) PANEL SESSION 7 – CINEMA AND POLITICS IN/OF IRAQ (02:00 P.M.–03:30 P.M.) PANEL SESSION 8 – SCREENING OF AL-QADISIYYA (1981) (145 MINUTES) (03:45 P.M.–06:15 P.M.) ROUNDTABLE ON SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING (9:00 A.M.–10:15 A.M.) PANEL SESSION 9 – HIGHER EDUCATION AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN IRAQ TODAY (10:30 A.M.–12:00 P.M.) PANEL SESSION 10 – IRAQ, THE U.S. AND THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISTS I (1:30 P.M.–3:00 P.M.) PANEL SESSION 11 – IRAQ, THE U.S. AND THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISTS II (3:15 P.M.–4:45 P.M.) CLOSING REMARKS DELIVERED BY SINAN ANTOON (05:00 P.M.–06:00 P.M.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".