Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) is an idiosyncratic cell-mediated hypersensitivity to allopurinol1 characterized by a diffuse morbilliform rash (which can evolve into exfoliative dermatitis), eosinophilia, worsening renal function, and fever2. Historical risk factors for AHS include renal insufficiency and diuretic use3, and because the syndrome can prove fatal, physicians managing hyperuricemia prescribe allopurinol with extreme caution4, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency5. With the introduction of febuxostat to the US market in 2009, patients with a history of AHS and/or renal disease gained an option for urate-lowering therapy, and physicians could prescribe febuxostat to at-risk populations with reduced concern of AHS. A syndrome similar to AHS had not been reported in any of febuxostat’s clinical trials, and none has been reported in the literature. We describe the case of a 69-year-old woman with multiple medical problems including gout and moderate renal insufficiency, who developed a hypersensitivity syndrome similar to AHS shortly after initiating febuxostat. She was referred to the University of Connecticut Health … E-mail: aabeles{at}uchc.edu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".