Behavioral and Biochemical Adaptations of Generalist and Specialist Herbivorous Insects Feeding on<i>Hypericum perforatum</i>(Guttiferae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The behavior and biochemical adaptations of 3 generalist insect species (Tettigonia viridissima L., Ruspolia nitidula Scopoli, and Conocephalus discolor Thunberg) and 3 specialists (Galeruca tanaceti L., Chrysolina geminata Payrtull, and Cloantha perspicillaris Boisduval) to the hypericin-containing leaves of Hypericum perforatum were investigated in southwestern France. The generalists preferentially fed on the part of the leaf lacking the phototoxic, hypericin-laden dark glands. The specialists showed no discriminatory feeding pattern but exhibited a negative phototaxis that is presumed to be an efficient strategy to circumvent the light-induced toxicity of hypericin. The constitutive and hypericin-inducible activities of glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase, 2 antioxidant enzymes which are considered to be biochemical adaptations used by phytophagous insects to attenuate the oxidative stress caused by photosensitization, were determined in the fatbody and midgut of T. viridissima, C. discolor, G. tanaceti, and G. geminata. The specialist insects had lower constitutive activities of glutathione S-transferase and glutathione reductase than the generalists, although the application of hypericin induced the activity of glutathione S-transferase in specialist insects only. Insects with different lifestyles therefore are capable of circumventing the phototoxic effects of hypericin by appropriate behavioral and biochemical strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".